King Arthur was Buried in Glastonbury

Image of King Arthur on his kingly attire and crown.
King Arthur – public domain

Was King Arthur real? Modern historians dismiss him as a myth, but in 1191 the monks at Glastonbury Abbey seemed to prove his existence when they found his tomb.

Nearly everyone has heard stories about King Arthur: his sword in the stone, his knights of the roundtable, his kingdom of Camelot… But there’s actually little to no historic proof of an early British king called Arthur.

The legendary king supposedly ruled sometime around the late 5th or early 6th century and fought against the invading Saxons. However, the first mention of a warrior called Arthur is 300-400 years later when, in 829, a Welsh monk called him a commander who fought alongside the kings of the Britons.

King Arthur and the Knights of the Roundtable are having a meeting when they see a vision of the Holy Grail in the center of the table.
King Arthur and his knights of the Round Table see a vision of the Holy Grail. Circa 1405-1407 – public domain

Medieval Embellishments

Then in 1138 Geoffrey of Monmouth included King Arthur in his History of Kings of Britain – and Medieval storytellers took it from there. They began circulating fantastic tales of King Arthur and his daring deeds – deeds which seemed to grow with each story.

Arthur’s Death

According to Geoffrey’s original story, when Arthur was mortally wounded, he was put in a boat and taken to the Isle of Avalon in hopes that he could be healed of his wounds. And Geoffrey ends his story there, leaving Arthur in Avalon. But at that time, no one knew where the Isle of Avalon was.

Fast forward to Glastonbury Abbey, 46 years after Geoffrey of Monmouth has written Arthur’s story…

What Glastonbury Abbey might have looked like before the fire – source

Fire Destroys Old Church and Relics

In 1184 the monks of Glastonbury Abbey were in a tizzy. Their monastery, and more importantly their Old Church, had been destroyed in a fire. This wasn’t just any church. It was called the Old Church because it was considered to be the first Christian church in Britain, possibly dating from the first few centuries AD.

The original building was probably a wattle structure, but it had been lovingly protected by an outer covering of wood and lead. The building itself was considered holy, but it was also chock-a-block with sacred relics that had accumulated through the years: bones of saints, pieces of their clothing, splinters of the cross, etc. And they were all displayed in boxes made of precious metals and adorned with jewels. In the 1120s, the church was described as containing “relics and reliquaries too numerous to count.”


The Old Church and its hallowed objects were a big draw for pilgrims who would come to pray at the holy building and the relics inside. Glastonbury was one of the oldest and holiest pilgrimage sites and the donations the visitors brought made them one of the wealthiest too. So, when the monks saw their church and all their precious relics destroyed under a pile of molten lead, they knew they had a big problem. Buildings could be rebuilt, but the loss of so many sacred objects was a disaster.

Images of Canterbury pilgrims on horses with city in background.
A Medieval pilgrimage – public domain

Money Problems

With money no longer coming in from pilgrimages, King Henry II stepped in with funds to help get the Abbey up and running again. The first priority was to rebuild on the holy site of the Old Church. The monks built the Lady Chapel there and completed it in two years. But three years later, when King Henry died, the funds ran out and work on the rest of the Abbey slowed down considerably.

Finding a Grave

Then one day, in 1191, seven years after the fire, the monks found the answer to their prayers (and money problems) in the old Abbey cemetery. They were digging between two old stone pyramids covered in worn, unreadable markings, when deep in the ground, they found something strange.

Image of monks removing the cross from the stone and finding the inscription.
Finding the stone and the cross (© Rahtz and Watts, 2003). Photo was taken at Glastonbury Abbey museum.

The Inscription

After digging six or seven feet deep, they came to a large stone lying down flat. They lifted it out so they could inspect it. A lead cross was attached to the back of the stone – the side facing downward. They pried off the cross and found an inscription hidden on the back of it – the side that had been facing the stone. All the monks were wondering at this strange sight. Then one of them began to translate: “Here lies buried the renowned King Arthur, with Guinevere his second wife, in the isle of Avalon.” Everyone gasped.

Years earlier King Henry II had sent word to the monks of Glastonbury about Arthur’s burial. He claimed that an old soothsayer had told him Arthur was buried there: very deep in the earth in a log casket.

A drawing of the cross found on King Arthur's tomb.
This drawing of the cross found on Arthur’s grave was published in 1607. Photo taken at Glastonbury Abbey museum.

The Coffin

They had searched the Abbey grounds when they first heard the story but had found nothing. Now this seemed like a miracle that had come at just the right time. If this was really King Arthur’s bones, it would certainly bring back the pilgrims and their sorely needed offerings.

The monks picked up their shovels and began digging again with more vigor. They dug deeper and deeper until, at about sixteen feet, they hit what seemed to be a tree buried horizontally in the earth. It turned out to be a large treetrunk coffin like those used in earlier times.

Word spread and a large crowd gathered (and probably paid) to see the coffin opened. After the monks had dug all around it, they struggled to lift the top off. As they hoisted the wooden lid out of the pit, the remains of two bodies were revealed: a man and a woman. There was also a lock of braided blond hair that looked completely intact – however, when a monk went to pick it up, it turned to dust in his hand.

Image of monks opening the casket while it is still in the ground.
Reconstruction of the exhumation of Arthur in 1191 (© Rahtz and Watts, 2003) – source

Arthur’s Bones

Everyone was astonished when they saw King Arthur’s skeleton: It was enormous. One monk took the shin bone and held it up against the tallest man there. It extended a good three inches above his knee. His eye sockets were a hand’s width apart, and he had at least ten wounds on his large skull. All had been scarred over except for one large one which had probably been the final blow.

The monks carefully lifted the bones out of the grave and wrapped them in cloth. They would have a new marble tomb made for Arthur and Guinevere and place it in the church.

The discovery of King Arthur’s tomb changed Glastonbury Abbey’s fortunes, as people from far and wide began making pilgrimages to see it. But Arthur wasn’t the only king buried at Glastonbury, three Saxon Kings were also buried there: Edmund I in 946, Edgar I in 975, and Edmund Ironside in 1016.

Illustration of the tomb of King Arthur in the church.
An illustration of Arthur and Guinevere’s tomb in Glastonbury Abbey. © Dominic Andrews

Edward I’s Visit

As the resting place of ancient kings, Glastonbury had a special place in the hearts of the Medieval monarchs. They liked to fancy themselves as descendants of the courageous King Arthur. In 1278 (87 years after the grave was found) Glastonbury Abbey was completely rebuilt and King Edward I and Queen Eleanor paid a visit.

In a special ceremony, the King and Queen reverently transferred Arthur and Guinevere’s bones to the new marble tomb which had been placed before the high altar. All except for their skulls and knee joints which “were kept out for the people’s devotion.”

Pilgrims flocked to Glastonbury to see King Arthur’s tomb for 348 years. Then in 1539 Henry VIII broke with the Catholic church and demolished monasteries around the country. Glastonbury Abbey was left in ruins and King Arthur’s tomb was lost forever.

Picture of abbey ruins and the sign marking the site of King Arthur's tomb.

The remains of the abbey can be visited today and the place where King Arthur’s tomb once stood is marked by a sign. It reads: “Site of King Arthur’s Tomb. In the year 1191 the bodies of King Arthur and his queen were said to have been found on the south side of the Lady Chapel. On 19th April 1278 their remains were removed in the presence of King Edward I and Queen Eleanor to a black marble tomb on this site. This tomb survived until the dissolution of the abbey in 1539.”

Historians now say that King Arthur probably didn’t exist, and that the grave discovery was most likely a hoax. But people today are just as intrigued by the mythical king as they were in the Middle Ages. And even though the Abbey is in ruins, they still come to look for Arthur.

You Might Also Like:

Read more stories like this in my book Bowlers, Brollies, and Brits: Curious Histories of England

Follow Me – If you would like to keep up with my articles, you can receive an email every time I post (every other week or so). Just enter your email below and click the Follow the Curious Rambler button.

Medieval image of King Arthur with his shield showing the Virgin Mary.
Pin it for later
Margo Lestz


  1. First, I love your account of Arthur, the burial, the facts such as they are. And now I, too, want to go to Glanstonbury. But what I really love is your wit, writing style, and ability to make what could be dry history a very relatable (is that even a word?) and interesting account. Thanks for making my day!

    1. Thank you so much – now you’ve made my day! 🙂
      Glastonbury is a tiny town packed full of interest so I hope you will get to go one day. I’ll be writing more about it later.
      Thanks again for your lovely comment.
      All the best, -Margo

    2. They invented the story to bring income from visitors in to save the abbey in vast debts at that time . The King Arthur tales are only myth designed around the fat that King Charles the great long before all of this is said to have happened did own a round table of Knights as Government of his empire .He had a sword called Excaliber .He rode in may battles at head of his armies and he loved his wife his Queen. Sound anything like the legend of Arthur yet? Arturious was a Roman solider who is said to be Arthur .Wrong he is a mix of many men of legend as is Robin Hood. The battle of the vale is said to have King Arthur dead in fighting. Not so the battle of vale or Camm is recorded as clash of ancient Britions against Saxon tribes in Cambridge area .No King was mentioned in record . GlasTonbury say they have the blood of Christ brought by Joseph of Aramathia . Not so Jesus is myth by Saul called Paul a Jews Romanzed name. He wanted riches from a new one God church and was murdered for greed by his patrons in Rome. So Glastonbury is just an old building that was built as house from monks before mankind grew wise to such tales

  2. Wonderful, Margo. Great piece of research. I think others have not looked as carefully as you have done before dismissing Arthur as a legend. The absolute chaos that engulfed England at the time Henry VIII declared himself head of the Church in England and resultant looting (pillaging it was called) of Monasteries and Churches can be compared to the looting and destruction we saw recently which accompanied protests at George Floyd’s death. We have also seen how that has expanded to the destruction of historical monuments. The same probably happened in the 16th century. There is perhaps a lesson in this…
    Many thanks for another interesting piece of research. Paula

    1. Hi Paula, The story is an intriguing one isn’t it. It’s usually considered as a hoax by the monks to bring in more money. But if it was a hoax whose bones were planted there? Gerald of Wales is considered a reliable writer of the time and he was eyewitness to the opening of the casket. So there was something there. Of course at this point, all evidence is lost, so we may never know. Henry VIII dissolved all the monasteries to get their wealth and that made Glastonbury a good target. But the ruins are still lovely.

      1. I like the way you retold the story. I too have previously done research on Arthur. While there are many stories about King Arthur and Geffory of Monmouth may have based his story on a mixing of many stories about different people, some factual, some fictional. Arthur was a real person and anyone who can read a map can go visit his grave, even today. However, it is not and has never been at Glastonbury. It is simply, hidden in plain sight. They say of course, when the legend becomes fact, print the legend.

        1. Please let me in on the secret. I’m pretty good at reading maps… 🙂 Where is he buried? I’m curious. 🙂

    1. Thank you Caroline. We are well – just itching to travel somewhere as soon as it’s safe.
      Best to you and your family. -Margo

  3. Thanks, Margo, for your research on King Arthur. My dad loved reading about King Arthur and so do I. Always wondered how he was just a mystical figure. Now I know that he did exist thanks to your research. I enjoy your writings!

    1. Thank you, I’m glad you enjoyed it. Whether Arthur was real or not, there sure are lots of good stories about him. 🙂

    1. Glastonbury really is an interesting little place. It’s filled with spiritualist kinds of shops and is supposed to be on some special energy lines. I’ve never been to the festival, but would like to go back and explore the town a bit more.

  4. The inscription names Guinevere as Arthur’s second wife. Who was allegedly his first wife? Thanks 🙂

    1. Well, there are lots of tales about King Arthur, and interestingly, in one of the old Welsh legends, Arthur had three wives (presumably not at the same time). And all three of them were named Guinevere. Perhaps that was a very common name in those days – or maybe Arthur just had a thing for women called Guinevere. We may never know. But in the later legends, there is usually only one Queen Guinevere. 🙂

  5. Thanks, Margo, for your reply.

    Since even the exhumation & inscription are legends, like all of the Arthurian tales, I suppose arriving at probable “truths” is quite a reach. But since I don’t usually seek out stories of Arthur, I hadn’t come across this oddity about 3 possible wives, especially all named the same! I was curious …

  6. As an engineer I wondered if the cross was a map with a mystery under the word REX (king). Could Arthurs remains have been buried here before the dissolution by Henry

    1. Thank you for your comment. With a mystery this old and with so little remaining evidence, I think all we can do is speculate. 🙂

  7. I visited Glastonbury while in art school in London and researched art history of the Holy Grail Bloodline for 10 years. Another researcher, a royal, told me King Arthur is an allegory for Jesus’ life after the crucifixion. Another that Jesus is also an allegory for somebody else, and not Jewish. Lot’s of confusion! The abbey was forewarned by family at Court and the bones moved again. Probably not to the usual type of tomb. Royals have the best info. King Arthur and Jesus were Kings and all blood royals are related. Tip: Quote the name of the artist or museum where the art is found, it looks nicer than “Public Domain.” Also more helpful for art history geeks like me 🙂 Deborah – Coded History.

Leave a Comment